Wed 9 Oct 2024 2:02PM
Organizing circle meeting: 2024-10-09
Flancian
Public
Seen by 5
We met on 2024-10-09 at 13 UTC for one hour. Attendance was low, likely because we didn't create a thread here in advance (unless I just haven't found it yet) :) So we did a quick meeting with an ad-hoc agenda (find notes below).
We probably want to establish a process to make sure a thread is created in advance of every meeting, or have a default thread to post announcements for upcoming meetings if that proves too burdensome (but it probably shouldn't be).
Flancian · Wed 9 Oct 2024 2:02PM
Notes follow :)
Attending: edumerco, matt, flancian
Check ins
matt: on commoning and farming
flancian: pixelfed, https://pixelfed.org/, for the visual sharing aspect
on building and consolidating before promoting
flancian: having lost a battle with Moloch, but living to fight another day ;) feeling more energized.
edumerco: note some battles are not worth fightining
edumerco: tired but OK, with cold sores. March to protect the universities in Argentina was a success.
Let's follow an ad hoc meeting structure due to low attendance?
Aye
Working Groups
tech
flancian:
dphiffer is now fully onboarded to the group
session with OC, notes are here [link]
alpha.social.coop: iterating over the PR
preparation for spam waves
script?
mailgun
each notification generates multiple emails
could spam accounts that are reported get automatically limited?
community
invoicing
coordination
spam response
instances with open registration and not too good moderation seem to have been at the core of the issue again
Should we treat instances with open registrations differentially?
Edumerco: this is discussed in the fediversalist papers
Sam and Emi jumped on the reports
Three issues that came up
A report generates a notification email and blew through our mailgun quota
-> we should fix this
No way to do a mass action in reports
-> this is what Mastodon should fix
Sam created a bot or tool to detect spamming accounts quickly
We could auto-limit spam reports from social.coop, and then review limits
Ekumen: best effort update
https://anagora.org/ekumen has some notes :)
https://codeberg.org/Ekumen is the Codeberg 'organization' containing several (for now empty) repositories
A kind of confederation within the larger "default Fediverse"
Web of trust based on a streamlined set of common values
The group will develop tools and foster coordination
Now seeding this group
Matt: first reaction is that the focus on the positive side of what we want, how we want to relate to each other seems very important
During the development of the SC CoC we also started focusing on what we want to prevent/what we want to push back against (like e.g. with the anti-pacts) and then moved on to focusing on what we actually want
On a very basic level, just setting up channels to exchange information with like-minded instances seems very important.
A block feed could be the MVP