Process

I had the thinking that there was a board member on every Jedi-just not sure where this came from (or if there are enough of you now), and that this person fed back to the board.

I still need to start a continuous improvement Jedi. The only Perma Jedi that doesn’t include a board member is Risk. All other Perma Jedis have a board member on them. I’m happy to join the risk Jedi.
Yes my understanding is also that a board member sits on Perma Jedis and feeds back to the board. At present this process is not documented.

I put a suggestion on another thread that maybe all the Jedi hosts (and potentially board) come together at least one a month (or maybe quarter) to discuss overlaps and decision making. With more Jedi's being held, is it realistic that a board member sit on each Jedi or is there another way the board can have oversight of each Jedi?

Is there a way we could go through a collective decision making process regarding new/reviewed Policies (not sure how cumbersome this would look like, but it could be worth a try).

I wonder if the Hosts and the Board need some line of communication to ensure a flow between each? My initial feeling is that a Board member should sit on each Jedi to ensure a flow back to the Board, but maybe each Host needs to confer with other Hosts and the Board for sign-off? Still quite teal - in that Hosts are checking in with others potentially affected by the decision, before finalising the decision...

I like that process, its teal and also allows a collective approach to decisions :-)

There's a "so you want to start a Jedi" document in development in the "Jedi" thread - I've done some work on it during a flight this week and will add these thoughts as well...