Making democracy work at campaign speed
Behind Zohran Mamdani's historic mayoral primary win was a decision-making system that coordinated 13,000 members with zero paid staff.
Loomio gives your group a dedicated space for the discussions and decisions you'll want to come back to, so everyone can participate.
Chat, email, and meetings each have a job. Important decisions need enough focus for people to understand the question, contribute thoughtfully, and see where the group landed.
One decision splinters across replies, side threads, and missing recipients. Later, nobody can find the outcome or the reasoning behind it.
If you miss the stream, you miss the decision. Important questions scroll away, and whoever happens to be online has the most influence.
Attendance determines whose voice is heard. The same debates return because minutes preserve the result, but rarely the reasoning.
"We try not to vote in chat mechanisms because there's no trail. We want to be able to go back and understand decision-making over time."Darren Goldner, NYC DSA
Loomio makes collaborative decision-making practical without asking your organization to reinvent how it works.
Put the question, background, and useful documents in one place. Invite the right people and give them time to think.
People share the reason for their position. Support becomes clear, concerns surface early, and the proposal can improve.
Close with a clear result and next steps. The discussion, reasons, and outcome remain searchable for the people who need them.
Different groups use Loomio in different ways. Find a story that feels familiar and see how they put collaborative decision-making into practice.
Behind Zohran Mamdani's historic mayoral primary win was a decision-making system that coordinated 13,000 members with zero paid staff.
A 60-year-old recruiting company threw out the org chart, gave every employee the same authority as the CEO, and scaled it to 450 people across three countries.
130 people from 32 countries bought apartments together. Now they have to run a business, a community, and a building — democratically.
850 teaching positions unfilled, a profession in crisis — and 28,000 union members who needed to debate strike action and reject government offers together.
150 people across three continents, restoring degraded land—and the decisions couldn't wait for the next meeting.
As the team grew past 20, the old way of deciding things stopped working.
240 participants from 70 countries, speaking dozens of languages, need to reach consensus — and they've never once had to fall back to a vote.
Worker-owned and open source, with whole-group pricing and hosting in USA, EU, or Australia/NZ.
"The tool doesn't just facilitate decisions, it invites transformation of how the team collaborates as a whole."Marin Petrov, Camplight