Transparent decisions your
whole organization can trust

Loomio helps your organization make decisions together
at the right pace, with clear reasoning, and a shared record of why

Every voice heard

Decisions that stick

A searchable record of why

Try Loomio for free

Decisions deserve better than email and chat

Lost in email

Important decisions buried in threads nobody can find. The wrong people weren't copied. There's no record of why.

Too fast in chat

Discussions scroll past before half your team wakes up. Weighty decisions made by whoever happens to be online.

Endless in meetings

You spend 30 minutes approving minutes. The same debates resurface because nobody remembers what was decided.

A better way to decide

Discuss with context

Start a focused thread with background information. Tag the right people. Give everyone time to think without letting decisions drift.

Vote with reasoning

People don't just click agree — they share why. When someone disagrees, you see their thinking. Perspectives shift, better outcomes emerge.

Record the outcome

Every decision has a clear result, next steps, and a timestamp. Years later, you can find it and understand the context.

See how it works in detail

"Being able to make decisions quickly and collaboratively in Loomio has been really important for us."

Darren Goldner, NYC Democratic Socialists of America

Political movement

Making democracy work at campaign speed

Behind Zohran Mamdani's historic mayoral primary win was a decision-making system that coordinated 13,000 members with zero paid staff.

Binding votes at scale
Anonymous member voting
Clear record of every decision
Full data control via self-hosting

Case study: NYC Democratic Socialists of America →

Loomio fills the gap in your tool stack

You already have tools for chat, documents, and tasks. None of them handle structured decisions.

Chat

day-to-day conversation

Slack, Teams, Matrix

Documents

collaborative writing, file storage

Drive, SharePoint

Tasks

project tracking, assignments

Asana, Jira

Decisions that need a record

"The record is really the key thing. Separating these consequential decisions from the noise. From email, from chat. Having a place where you can easily reference what was decided and why."

Jared Messinger, World Resources Institute

Environmental nonprofit

How a global nonprofit brought transparency to distributed decisions

150 people across three continents, restoring degraded land—and the decisions couldn't wait for the next meeting.

Clear record of key decisions
Structured input from distributed teams
Multi-stage approvals across time zones
Decisions separated from communication noise

Case study: World Resources Institute →

How a global nonprofit brought transparency to distributed decisions

"Before we vote, people are normally very vocal, but after we have voted, everyone is like, okay, now we have made a decision, and that's a decision."

Matthias Zeitler, Semkovo Co-op

Coliving cooperative

Running a property co-op without ever meeting in person

130 people from 32 countries bought apartments together. Now they have to run a business, a community, and a building — democratically.

Legally binding cooperative votes
Full agency for distributed members
Searchable governance discussion archive
Member participation tracking

Case study: Semkovo Co-op →

"Loomio is very important for us, not just from the perspective of input we want to gather, but from the archival perspective. People can point to the exact discussion when a decision was made, and why."

Anton Arapov, OpenSSL Project

Open source project

Governing the library that secures the Internet

When the whole internet depends on your library, you can't make decisions behind closed doors anymore.

Multi-stakeholder community input
Transparent archive of every decision
Delegate voting balances power fairly
Reach beyond your developer community

Case study: OpenSSL →

"One of our first decisions at the General Assembly was to make Loomio decisions count as official ones. It's in our Articles of Association that we can use this sort of governance."

Anja Petkovic Komel, Argot Collective

Technology collective

Building blockchain without bosses

Twenty-eight developers spun out of the Ethereum Foundation with no hierarchy, no executives, and a rule that every decision must have everyone's consent.

Consent-based distributed decisions
Legally binding governance decisions
Every voice heard across time zones
Official record of decision rationale

Case study: Argot Collective →

"We needed to add clarity and transparency to the decision-making process. Now that we have implemented Loomio, we can see and trust that the decision the team made is the best we could have done at the time."

Marin Petrov, Camplight