***Vote this week or Next: Fiscal Sponsor - Which One?***
Jackie
Public
Seen by 18
Here’s a good test of loomio. for a group wide finance decision coming up 4/9 or 4/16.
This is a two step decision
whether to use a fiscal sponsor
which fiscal sponsor to use
This Discussion deals with Step 2 Which Fiscal Sponsor to Use
- please keep the discussion focused on that.
Fiscal Sponsors Info
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i2vI-FRCh4VFl5uXfAFAqr2tLTxBffunyHdGnBQG6N8/edit
All other finance matters will have their own discussion/decision space
Poll Created Tue 15 Apr 2014 6:14AM
Proposal to Use AFGJ as Fiscal Sponosr Closed Thu 17 Apr 2014 4:39AM
AFGJ as fiscal sponsor proposal passed here and on the call.
Loomio tip: I closed before I voted and doesn't seem to have a re-open to edit option. I abstained on the call cuz I brought the proposal and have a relationship with AFGJ. Cal cuz he's IO
Proposal to use AFGJ as fiscal sponsor for the Natgat3 general donation fund. Budget decisions to come out of the general fund to be decided by the whole ngwg. This would be items like food, ground necessities, supplies not met elsewhere.
Info and links to more info are on this pad.
http://natgat2014.titanpad.com/49
Results
| Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Agree | 75.0% | 3 |
|
| Abstain | 25.0% | 1 |
|
|
| Disagree | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 0% | 7 |
|
4 of 11 people have participated (36%)
Lisa
Tue 15 Apr 2014 8:33AM
I'm sorry Janet pulled out, but glad she did so early enough for us to choose AFGJ.
Tricia
Tue 15 Apr 2014 8:45AM
Worked ok last year
Julia Clark
Wed 16 Apr 2014 4:34AM
Building an enduring relationship that NATGAT 2015 can build upon is good. Perhaps even leave it in place to build for next year after this year is complete.
Jackie Thu 17 Apr 2014 4:57AM
AFGJ as fiscal sponsor proposal passed here and on the call. with similar ratio.
3 yes -1 abstain
21% of members stated their position (4/19)
Call 8 yes :3 stand aside
11 of c.15-20 regular call participants (I think c.70 all told on email list, loomio and facebook) so either 70ish% or 15% - depending on the definition of the planning group
No NOs
No Blocks
one person who voted here voted on the call
3 people who voted here were on the call, but not the vote
I'll think I'll try to keep track of this as we go.
Jackie · Tue 15 Apr 2014 6:16AM
The proposal presumes we decide to use a fiscal sponsor. That decision will come first.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i2vI-FRCh4VFl5uXfAFAqr2tLTxBffunyHdGnBQG6N8/edit?disco=AAAAAJSsLxE