Robin Hood Tax (Taxing the banks).
I once watced the documentary "Inside New Zealand: Mind the Gap" (http://goo.gl/71paiU), and they discused Robin Hood tax (http://goo.gl/CzOGox), where there is a 0.5% tax on the transactions made by the banks (not including consumer transactions), I belive there are a number of European countries that use this tax and it is working for them, and according to the documentary, in England it would raise up 100 billion pounds a year.
So I ask would Internet-Mana and anyone else like to see this idea explored and possibly developed further to be implemented to the New Zealand government?
Heath Blyde Fri 1 Aug 2014 3:09AM
So the FTT would only be put onto the banks or all transactions made?
Jim Bennett Fri 1 Aug 2014 3:35AM
Totally support. It was suggested by another party in NZ some years ago, but the idea had not gained credibility then. Now it has, and needs to be acted on.

Colin Davies Fri 1 Aug 2014 4:00AM
I see this as worse than GST.
Evertime I use my eftpos I will be taxed.
Whether I use my minimum wage for consumption or savings I will be taxed.
Businesses can easily avoid most FTT if its not done unilaterally with our trade partners. They can't skip GST.
This is most definitely not a tax on Banks like the title suggests. Its a tax on bank users, and the bank is the tax collector.
I totally agree with taxing banks. Eg tax the bank on movement shifts. The banks will just pass this on to mortgage payers, and house prices will drop.

Wade Vuglar Fri 1 Aug 2014 4:03AM
@heathblyde I'd whack it on all FT's. At a tenth of a percent it is tiny enough not to adversely impact the less fortunate of us.
Cutting GST is the FASTEST way to help the less fortunate. It gives an instant 15% price reduction of everything, and thats got to be good.
Heath Blyde Fri 1 Aug 2014 4:13AM
@colindavies As @wadevuglar said; Its such a small amount that it wouldn't be noticeable, and the bank doesn't get any of the money from this tax.
Btw, wade has brought forward and idea, this is the purpose of a discussion, to share ideas.

Colin Davies Fri 1 Aug 2014 5:29AM
@wadevuglar
Cutting GST is the FASTEST way to help the less fortunate. It gives an instant 15% price reduction of everything, and thats got to be good.
I think its more like a direct 13.04% if you try a base calculation, without taking into account the cascade effects of GST which are quite large.

Colin Davies Fri 1 Aug 2014 5:37AM
@heathblyde
and the bank doesn’t get any of the money from this tax.
I certainly never suggested it did.
The bank is the collector of the tax. And its not a tx on banks.
Its such a small amount that it wouldn’t be noticeable
It might not appear as much on an individuals bank statement. But it wouldn't be suggested if it could replace GST. So logic suggests it must have an effect.
True GST is a regressive tax but it is efficient and it is fair in comparison to FTT.
If FTT was isolated to shareTransactions, Currency dealings and property deals it would effect the poor like me less. However the players would soon discover ways to skip it.
Ian Kiddle Fri 1 Aug 2014 7:03AM
I agree with this. Taxation should be about incentivising desirable behaviour, working,providing employment, producing and benefitting the community. Disincentivising undesirable behaviour, being a parasite, clipping the ticket of productive enterprises, usury and maybe some stuff I have not thought of. A Robin Hood tax is a big step towards a better society.
Heath Blyde Fri 1 Aug 2014 7:16AM
So from what I can gather, @iankiddle and @colindavies you both think that the initial idea of the Robin Hood tax is the better idea? (and that the FTT tax isn't in the best interests of New Zealand)
Wade Vuglar · Fri 1 Aug 2014 3:04AM
Yep an Financial Transaction Tax of just a tenth of a percent on ALL Financial Transactions would net more per day than GST.
I would propose dropping the poor tax (GST) and replace it with an FTT of 0.01%