That one make sense to me, as it's the easiest way to match exactly the value of what was paid and refund it.

It seems like the most consistent way to do things

If the payee wants that. How about letting payees decide whether they want ETH or DAI?

I think ideally people should be allowed to choose. That's also why we have the option - but I'll go with the majority.

More preferable than Ether but theres still overheads involved in cash in/out. One of the better ways of handling things, but not ideal.

I'd let people chose, no? Some people prefer eth bcs they want to support the system? I'm fine with both decisions, if we need to decide.

Let the payee have a choice, but to me this preferable.

I think ideally people should be allowed to choose. That's also why we have the option - but I'll go with the majority.

I think that by trying to migrate as much as possible to DAI and harden the software in that direction, the more useful our DApp gets for collecting donations.

$ peg makes it an extrinsic motivator, the more serendipitous the better!

Anything akin to salaries should be paid in the most stable currency available and usable by both parties. Since DAI is now an option, I would prefer DAI.

I for one, hope that they'll be able to buy a lambo one day with those points. FYI to Adam S: RewardDAO is meant as a welcoming incentive, not salary.

To clarify - this means Reward DAO stays on ETH (I think Lanski might have gotten it the other way around?)

I think Reward DAO is a great entry gate for people that might not necessarily be into crypto, and it's not a payment for services but a "reward" for helping out... It's better and more useful to get new people into the ecosystem to give them ETH, which has more possibilities!

Interesting question, no opinion on this particular round if precedents have been set but I'd suggest that only once the reality manifests should agreements be allowed to take effect. Otherwise we are encouraging speculation (and in other cases it that could be that we end up wasting time discussing things that never matter because they actually never manifest!)

Considering that BrightID has $11,000 in DAI in its Giveth campaign, and is expecting to have $44,000 more in the next couple of weeks, we need a way to transfer that to individuals as soon as possible.

I was hoping for DAI to be available for milestones at least from the day it had been approved in gov meeting.

I think Reward DAO is a great entry gate for people that might not necessarily be into crypto, and it's not a payment for services but a "reward" for helping out... It's better and more useful to get new people into the ecosystem to give them ETH, which has more possibilities!

Integrate automated conversion into the dapp is a pipe dream until we move to the xDAI chain... and even then, its a pretty ridiculous ask on the tech side.

For now we can convert (no cdp or we'll be considered playing with their money) but integrated conversion should be put on the roadmap

I think we should be as donation agnostic as possible to maximise input flow! For operations however it makes sense to convert into DAI (minimise currency volatility etc) but as mentioned traceability is still important. Keeping choice open I'd suggest that non automated conversion would be way to go, if there is massive demand for automation it can be done later perhaps. The follow up question/decision being which service/tool to use (lowest margin? easiest SDK? etc).

If that is possible somehow, I would love this solution!

I changed my answer (had direct exchange before - but don't think its feasible). I would suggest to have a standard budget in DAI (in percent or absolute numbers), to have a stable budget to better plan and survive economic downturns