Changing the membership structure for this working group
Just to clarify the membership of this group, I propose we do the following:
Change the membership of this subgroup in Loomio to include ONLY the elected members of the Finance Working Group
Ensure that the subgroup's activities are visible (and commentable?) to all Social.coop members for transparency
One motivation of this, among others, is to facilitate the use of the Gateway bot.
Thoughts? @Matthew Cropp is admin of the subgroup.
If there is general agreement, I'll make a proposal to this effect so we have it on record.
Nathan Schneider Thu 16 Dec 2021 6:54PM
The Metagov Gateway software we discussed implementing yesterday:) Sorry for the changing names. gateway.metagov.org
Josh Davis Thu 16 Dec 2021 6:55PM
Ah, ok. I thought maybe that was it.
Poll Created Mon 20 Dec 2021 5:30PM
Make the finance working group viewable to all of Social.coop, but with only working group as members Closed Sun 26 Dec 2021 5:02PM
I just removed all members who are not us (and Shauna).
See this thread for details and rationale: https://www.loomio.org/d/Nbp8U5zq/changing-the-membership-structure-for-this-working-group
Results
Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Agree | 100.0% | 4 | |
Abstain | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Disagree | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Undecided | 0% | 2 |
4 of 6 people have participated (66%)
Nathan Schneider
Mon 20 Dec 2021 5:30PM
I think we need a bit more clarity reflected in Loomio about who is and isn't in the working group.
Nathan Schneider Wed 22 Dec 2021 6:41AM
One question I have about this approach: Would non-members still be able to add comments if they are not members? It might be problematic if they can't.
Josh Davis Wed 22 Dec 2021 7:28AM
Yes, I think they should be able to comment.
Josh Davis · Thu 16 Dec 2021 6:53PM
Sounds fine with me. Forgive my ignorance, but what is the Gateway bot?