Soft freeze exemptions for 3.4
Polls regarding whether freeze exemptions should be granted for the 3.4 release.
Developers requesting a freeze exemption guarantee, that they will be fully committed to make any code introduced based on this exemption with extreme care throughout the bugfixing period and that they are available to fix any inconveniences introduced by them.
A freeze exemption is no guarantee for merging but rather a prolonged reviewing period, which will be used to guarantee only code of very high quality shall enter the QGIS codebase.
Feature freeze starts 2018-09-14
QGIS 3.4 release is 2018-10-26
Note: while every vote is much appreciated, there is no obligation to vote on a request. If you feel undecided, please abstain or ask a question in order to get the information needed to make an informed vote.
Poll Created Fri 7 Sep 2018 11:43AM
Geometry validation functionality Closed Mon 10 Sep 2018 11:01AM
Add an integrated solution to visualize geometry errors introduced in the current editing session and aid users to fix them.
Includes fixes for thread-safety and other code enhancements for the existing geometry checker code.
Background information
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/131
Results
| Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Agree | 66.7% | 14 |
|
| Abstain | 23.8% | 5 |
|
|
| Disagree | 9.5% | 2 |
|
|
| Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 0% | 8 |
|
21 of 29 people have participated (72%)
Werner Macho
Fri 7 Sep 2018 11:48AM
the earlier it is integrated the better for later versions. fixing geometry errors is one of the most annoying things.
Borys Jurgiel
Sun 9 Sep 2018 6:49AM
Not an easy decision, but it's so huge facilitation for users (and quality boost for the digitized vectors), I believe most people involved in trainings will agree it's fully justifiable to have it it this LTR.
Magnus
Sun 9 Sep 2018 10:14AM
Is there a time plan?
Andreas Neumann
Mon 10 Sep 2018 7:00AM
As much as I like the "geometry validation functionality" and would like to see it in QGIS, I think we should make a habit of delaying feature freeze. QGIS 3.0 should be an exception.
Andreas Neumann
Mon 10 Sep 2018 7:01AM
As much as I like the "geometry validation functionality" and would like to see it in QGIS, I think we should not make a habit of delaying feature freeze. QGIS 3.0 should be an exception.
Pirmin Kalberer Fri 7 Sep 2018 12:37PM
@luigipirelli I didn't find an explanation why the 4rth geometry checker implementation couldn't wait for 3.6
Jürgen E. Fischer Sat 8 Sep 2018 11:04AM
Maybe a late funding decision on something that still should go into the LTR.
Luigi Pirelli Fri 7 Sep 2018 1:05PM
tnx @pirminkalberer
Luigi Pirelli · Fri 7 Sep 2018 11:53AM
@pirminkalberer can you elaborate please? I didn't find yuor coments in the relative thread in qgis dev list.