Loomio
Fri 29 Sep 2017 10:51PM

e-NABLE Project Proposals

JS Jeremy Simon Public Seen by 124

Have a project you'd like to undertake for the e-NABLE volunteer community? Create a new thread in the E-nablio to discuss it, and when you think it's it's ripe, write a proposal in that thread to allow the community to vote on whether or not the project should move forward. Project proposals may include a request for funding, but this is optional (some projects may not require funding).

To ensure everyone has the information needed to make an informed decision, each project proposal should include the following information at a minimum:

  1. Clear description of work to be performed
  2. Expected results/impact
  3. Estimate of work effort involved (# of hours)
  4. Estimated timeline for completion of the effort
  5. Names of individuals responsible for completing work
  6. Amount of funding being requested (if any) - please specify an exact amount, not a range. If the project is approved, we need to know how much funding to allocate
  7. A brief overview of your background with e-NABLE (work you've done in the past) - so people know who is proposing the project

Feel free to include a link to a Google Doc with a more detailed project outline.

Ownership of work products

In the spirit of the e-NABLE community, any work products resulting from a funded project will be considered open source and available for anyone to use. Please be prepared to share your work so others may benefit from your results.

To Submit a Project Proposal

To submit a project proposal, go to the main E-nablio page on Loomio and click the New Decision button, then select Proposal. Copy and paste the template content below and provide the details for your proposal. Set the voting duration to at least one week (preferably longer) to allow sufficient community input.

Project Approval

Each project proposal must receive at least 15 votes with at least 80% of the votes in support of the project in order to be approved. This number of required votes may increase in the future, as participation in this process grows stronger.

For determining the approval percentage, "Abstain" votes are not counted in the total. So the formula for the approval percentage is:
(A / (A + D)) * 100
Where A = # of Agree Votes and D = # of Disagree Votes

To be approved, both criteria (minimum number of votes and percentage support) must be met. For example, if a proposal has 20 "Agree" votes and 10 "Disagree" votes, that would meet the minimum number of votes, but it would not meet the required percentage (since only 66.7% of the votes are in support of the project). In this case, the project would not be approved.

Project Sponsorship

While not required, it is recommended that mini-grant proposals be sponsored by an e-NABLE Chapter. A proposal that includes a chapter sponsorship will have a higher likelihood of being approved.

Here are some suggestions for having a proposal sponsored:

  • The project owner can be part of an e-NABLE Chapter and the chapter can act as project sponsor.
  • If the project owner is not part of a chapter, the project owner may connect with an existing chapter and ask them to sponsor the project.
  • The project owner will report the project status to the chapter, and the chapter will report back to the community via weekly SPC (Strategic Planning Committee) meetings.
  • The funds will be given to the chapter, and the chapter will allocate funds to the project owner/team based on project deliverables.
  • The project owner will be accountable for the project deliverables and the Chapter will act as the project sponsor, ensuring that project deliverables are completed and commitments fulfilled.

.
.
.


Project Proposal Template (copy and paste the below content to create your own proposal)

Proposals can also include images, links, etc., using Markdown.

A convenient markdown editor can be found here:


Description of Proposed Project:

[Replace with your content]

Expected results/impact:

[Replace with your content]

Estimate of work effort involved:

[Replace with your content]

Estimated timeline for completion:

[Replace with your content]

Names of individuals responsible for deliverables:

[Replace with your content]

Amount of funding being requested:

[Replace with your content]

A brief overview of my background with e-NABLE:

[Replace with your content]

NOTE: The formatting will not transfer when you copy and paste to a new proposal. Preface a line with # (followed by a space) to format it as a heading.

JS

Jeremy Simon
Agree
Fri 3 Nov 2017 2:08PM

Looks like an interesting project! Should result in some useful data for the e-NABLE community.

PB

Peter Binkley
Agree
Fri 3 Nov 2017 3:59PM

Looks like a well designed study. Has this type of accelerometer been used in similar studies?

JS

Jon Schull
Abstain
Fri 3 Nov 2017 7:56PM

very exciting! Would you provide a link to the supporting materials? (Research design, IRB proposal)
What actigraph product? etc.
@JenMankoff has co-developed a sensor device that might be an alternative to the actigraph. ...

JS

Jon Schull
Agree
Sun 5 Nov 2017 2:42AM

very exciting! Thanks for you supporting materials! (Research design, IRB proposal)
What actigraph product? etc.
@JenMankoff has co-developed a sensor device that might be an alternative to the actigraph. ...

JS

Jon Schull
Agree
Tue 7 Nov 2017 2:04AM

very exciting! Thanks for you supporting materials! (Research design, IRB proposal)
What actigraph product? etc.
@JenMankoff has co-developed a sensor device that might be an alternative to the actigraph. ...

EL

Everton Lins Fri 3 Nov 2017 6:11PM

For now I will abstain from the proposal Using 3D Prosthetic Hands to Improve the Quality of Life of Appalachian Children because I have some questions.

Cole, could you help me with the questions below?

Thank you very much!

  • Is this study a paper that you must present to the university as part of your professional training and that will be graded or is it voluntary work?
  • After the project is completed the data (raw data) will belong to the university or will be available to be used in other projects of the e-NABLE community?
  • Have you found the 5 children that will participate in the study?
  • Will statistical data be generated based on 3 to 5 case studies or you plan to acquire more participants?
  • Do you already have the devices (ActiGraph Link) for the project?
  • Since the connection software comes with the device you are requesting funds to acquire the data interpretation software only?
CC

Cole Carter Fri 3 Nov 2017 8:54PM

Thanks for the reply Everton.
This is not a graded project. It is sponsored by my university in which I get lab space and funds for some supplies. My grant covers hard supplies but not the software. I was initially planning on using the Actigraph GT3X-BT. I will have grant funds available soon, and have not purchased the devices. As far as I know, the devices and software can be sold separately. I was able to get a discount quote of $1000 for one full package. I would be happy to share my data, and want to continue the collaborative spirit. I am also interested in the sensor device that @jonschull mentioned, and hope to learn more soon!

I do not have the participants yet, but I am in active communication with occupational therapists and certified prosthetists who have offered e-NABLE devices to patients who they see fit. Through communication with these professionals, I have made a hand for one individual, and I am currently in the process of two more. Whether I will be able to get Actigraphy data on these two individuals is to be determined, but I have gathered baseline survey data.

I plan for this to be an ongoing project, and this is a pilot study to provide proof of concept for more large scale, collaborative studies. I greatly value the team efforts of e-NABLE, and hope to help and participate!

EL

Everton Lins Sun 5 Nov 2017 4:10PM

Thanks for the feedback, @colecarter.
As @jonschull pointed, if Jennifer's sensor delivers the output you need for the study, can we consider using it instead Actigraph?
I think using it as the standard device will make it easier to reproduce the tests with other e-NABLE groups after this proof of concept.

CC

Cole Carter Tue 7 Nov 2017 4:40PM

@evertonlins, while I like the idea of somehow incorporating Jennifer's sensors, I think it would be valuable to gather Actigraph data first, as it is considered by many to be the "gold standard" method for tracking activity and movement. Furthermore, Actigraphy data may be a good control for evaluating other tracking methods.

RB

Rich B Tue 7 Nov 2017 1:40PM

I Agree: The Big Picture here is that it will be a published medical study. I would love to see a larger group involved with a plan to follow in 6 month periods. IRB's are keeping us out of Shriners in Tampa and this study may help open other doors.

CC

Cole Carter Tue 7 Nov 2017 4:34PM

Thanks for your reply, Rich. This is hopefully a good starting point for other studies with a larger sample size. Once I have some proof of concept, I would be happy to help with a larger study which incorporates a greater sample size. I also agree that retrospective follow up study would also be valuable. All exciting things to consider.

SAP

Poll Created Tue 21 Nov 2017 10:26PM

Let's Make a Newsletter Closed Fri 15 Dec 2017 10:03PM

Description of Proposed Project:

e-NABLE launched a newsletter this summer, but with no one to lead the project, it has not yet flourished. By Jon Schull's invitation, I would like to propose that I write a monthly newsletter for e-NABLE.

Expected results/impact:

To develop, maintain, and share news about the e-NABLE community.
To inspire and foster collaboration between e-NABLE volunteers through the sharing of information about their challenges and successes.
To contribute to the cohesive union of an international organization through the sharing of community.

Estimate of work effort involved:

This proposal provides a vision for the position of newsletter writer. The position would be 10 hours of work a month. During this time, I would research e-NABLE's biggest news, write the articles, and format the articles into an appealing document for easy sharing.

Estimated timeline for completion:

One newsletter completed per month, starting in January, for the duration of one year, to be renewed after the duration of one year.

Names of individuals responsible for deliverables:

Sarah Paynter

Amount of funding being requested:

I request $1,500 for the year contract, which is $125 per newsletter, or $12.50 an hour, which is half my professional rate. This is to be paid in installments, one per newsletter.

A brief overview of my background with e-NABLE:

I have been talking with Jon Schull about writing on several projects for him. I am the former founding CEO of a drone-based aerial data acquisition company, and I have both volunteer and professional experience in the maker field. Today, I work as a technical writer for Wevolver, an engineering community. I recently wrote a series of articles about exiii, another charitable organization that 3D prints prosthetic devices, and I am well-versed in the field. I have previously run newsletters for four nonprofit organizations, and I am comfortable with my expertise and ability to address the topics addressed by e-NABLE. Please visit www.sarahpaynter.net for my full credentials and work samples. Visit https://archive.benchmarkemail.com/e-NABLE/newsletter/e-NABLE-Newsletter---August--2017 for the previous August newsletter I would emulate.

I hope you will consider me to take up the torch for your newsletter. e-NABLE is an amazing global community, but with that comes challenges. As we seek unity among these varied parts, the sharing of information is vital. A community newsletter is a substantial step in walking with one another as we give the world a helping hand.

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 72.0% 18 JS EL E JS RB AT JS SM ELD PS MP CC RK ESL GF RV WM MVL
Abstain 16.0% 4 T PG CC DS
Disagree 12.0% 3 JO TO AJ
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 44 AB DU J W ME JL MH AC PB JS AD JP LB DD GD JB B AT DU DM

25 of 69 people have participated (36%)

JS

Jeremy Simon
Agree
Tue 21 Nov 2017 10:31PM

I'd like to see this move forward, but I would suggest considering quarterly payments instead of monthly. Our financial mechanisms aren't as nimble as a typical organization with full-time staff, so it would be preferable to send money less often.

AT

Ashley Turner
Agree
Wed 22 Nov 2017 2:54AM

I like the idea. Instead of one person writing everything, perhaps some of the content could be solicited from members and groups of the community. Also, this could be a good forum for the leadership to post summary updates on issues.

PS

Phil Slusser
Agree
Wed 22 Nov 2017 6:44AM

With the membership growing this could be an excellent platform a 3 D printer company to reach a lot of potential customers. I would suggest we contact them for advertising.

JS

Jack Sutcliffe
Agree
Tue 28 Nov 2017 5:08PM

I'd liked to know what other people are currently working throughout the e-NABLE community. Will you be working through enablingthefuture.org/ e-NABLE Like Page using a 'posts' format? I just hope its not a separate e-NABLE web address.

GF

Goeran Fiedler
Agree
Fri 1 Dec 2017 5:47PM

Suggested to report some metrics on the success of the newsletter

RB

Rich B
Agree
Sun 3 Dec 2017 1:51PM

Having worked on the original news team, I believe the content of the newsletter should be suggested by the community. 3D Tech info and e-NABLE or just e-NABLE activity?

JO

Jen Owen
Abstain
Thu 7 Dec 2017 10:42PM

I would love to see a newsletter, but I would also love to see the cost for this a little lower as a more of a volunteer rate. Perhaps $75-100 per newsletter? With a review after 3 months with feedback on reach etc.

JO

Jen Owen
Disagree
Fri 8 Dec 2017 2:26AM

I would love to see a newsletter, but I would also love to see the cost for this a little lower as a more of a volunteer rate. Perhaps $75-100 per newsletter? With a review after 3 months with feedback on reach etc.

RB

Rich B
Agree
Wed 13 Dec 2017 12:00PM

I spoke personally with Sarah and suggest that if any of you are on the edge,that we can get things rolling. Having been on the original Newsletter team I know what's involved and she can do the job.

AJ

Asad Jabbar
Disagree
Thu 14 Dec 2017 4:21AM

Not a monthly newsletter is required. It should be quarterly published. More of the devices given, require time to make and some are in research phase so it would be beneficial if more of a grpund work to be done

T

Theo
Abstain
Thu 14 Dec 2017 9:34PM

A newsletter in english will not reach our french speaking base.

RH

Poll Created Sun 31 Dec 2017 1:14PM

eNABLE Odenton 501(c)3 Filing Closed Sun 14 Jan 2018 5:03AM

Update: Thanks for the feedback everyone! It seems like the opinion is pretty clear, so I'll have to see what else I can look into going forward.

Abstract: I request funding in the amount of $495 to fund the filing of Articles of Incorporation in the state of Maryland to establish eNABLE Odenton as a nonprofit corporation as well as to file for federal tax exempt status.

Cost Breakdown:

$220 to file Articles of Incorporation and file for state tax exemption
$275 to file an IRS form 1023ez to gain federal tax exemption

Background: eNABLE Odenton had delivered two hands since founding in September 2017. We are 100% self-funded by the chapter founder and we borrow time on his printer to fabricate parts. We have no coherent outreach strategy and a minimal organizational structure. We are quickly reaching the limits of our funding and recruiting, but through our presence in some social media groups, we have contacted a large pool of demand for eNABLE support. We have been approached with offers of monetary support but we have no method to receive donations other than personally to the chapter president which is not satisfactory.

We propose to establish a 501(c)3 named eNABLE Odenton Limited. We would use the requested funds for that purpose. We would then split fundraising 50/50 with eNABLE until we have repaid the starting funds and them we would share 10% of future funds raised in perpetuity.

Further, we will document the entire process for the community's use to aid other chapters who wish to take this step. I will also offer to mentor any other chapter who needs assistance going through this process.

My proposed corporate structure is below, with job descriptions. I believe this could be an effective model for chapters run by individuals who do not have the support of academic institutions. eNABLE gains a new funding stream and a model for future use, we gain the support we need to grow to meet future demand and provide support to other chapters.

Structure: The Board of Directors would consist of five members who are also the chapter’s officers. The positions are Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operations Officer, Chief Communications Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Administrative Officer. The Board would vote on changes to corporate structure and establish elections to replace itself on a regular basis.

Responsibilities:

CEO: Overall manager of the organization. Makes final decisions on governance, recruitment, vision, long-term planning and outreach. Has authority to sign for the chapter on legal and financial documents. Represent the chapter by speaking at local events.

COO: Manages all device production, equipment use, inventory. Runs chapter presence on Enable Web Central. Coordinates and assigns volunteers to chapter cases. Works to become able to serve as an expert on EWC cases.

CCO: Manage chapter social and traditional media initiatives. Handle public relations. Conduct outreach to find potential device users. Follow up worth users to assess success of donated devices. Generate media material for use and sharing with eNABLE community.

CFO: Manage chapter finances. Purchase supplies and equipment for chapter use. Keep accurate financial records for review. Collaborate with CEO to make required filings. Coordinate fundraising activities.

CAO: Responsible for records management. Manage chapter correspondence with outside groups. Keep accurate and transparent records for review by stakeholders. Create and transmit notes of any chapter meetings.

I have thought a lot about this but I would really welcome any feedback and I'm excited to hear the community's opinion. Thanks for your time!

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 20.0% 3  
Abstain 13.3% 2  
Disagree 66.7% 10  
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 0  

15 of 15 people have participated (100%)

👤

Anonymous
Agree
Sun 31 Dec 2017 1:18PM

I very much like the proposal of using funding from the community as an accelerator, with promise of refund.

👤

Anonymous
Disagree
Sun 31 Dec 2017 2:42PM

I believe funding for chapters should be raised within the incubator group of the chapter.

👤

Anonymous
Disagree
Sun 31 Dec 2017 4:16PM

not long enough track record; no need for each chapter to be its own 501 in the US, would make more sense to work under a central organisation.

👤

Anonymous
Disagree
Sun 31 Dec 2017 5:42PM

I think you have a great business plan, but feel this funding should be limited to research proposals.

👤

Anonymous
Abstain
Mon 8 Jan 2018 3:33PM

I am not sure on this. While I think the cause is right, it seems like we grow the other way. Local folks band together to raise the money. If e-Nable funds chapters then they are more like plants that will wither without constant tending.

👤

Anonymous
Disagree
Tue 9 Jan 2018 5:32PM

A valuable proposal, thanks. We want to promote chapters and projects; it's not clear we want proliferating 501(c)3s.

Indeed, I'm working on OpenCollective to reduce the need for that.

👤

Anonymous
Disagree
Tue 9 Jan 2018 5:33PM

A valuable proposal, thanks. We want to promote chapters and projects; it's not clear we want proliferating 501(c)3s.

Indeed, I'm working on OpenCollective to reduce the need for that. --(Jon)

👤

Anonymous
Disagree
Sun 14 Jan 2018 1:05AM

I love that there are so many new chapters popping up and that people are passionate about this project but I feel that it is the Chapter responsibility to come up with the funding for obtaining a 501c3 status.

JO

Poll Created Wed 28 Mar 2018 12:23AM

E-NABLE Community Printables, Flyer, Event materials packet Closed Sat 31 Mar 2018 12:03AM

Outcome
by Jen Owen Mon 27 Aug 2018 4:27PM

Approved! Congratulations to Jen Owen and to the e-NABLE community, which should soon be able to see, enjoy, and employ these printables!

And here are the first deliverables

Description of Proposed Project:

Creation of an e-NABLE Community Printables Packet, Posters, Business Cards and event materials that can be edited by volunteers who may want to replace the English text with text in their own language and add their own e-NABLE Chapter logo and information to it.

While we have a small handful of printables that have been created over the years for use by e-NABLE Volunteers at events and school functions, we do not have a solid informational pamphlet with the history and info requested by attendees at events on how they can get involved and what it takes to become a chapter or volunteer or how to get involved as a recipient or designer.

I would like to propose that some of the funds that have been set aside for me from the Community vote to support my work, be used to pay for my time in creating a solid Printables packet for the community.

Expected Results/Impact:

• A universal set of editable print materials and informational flyers and pamphlets, event banners, posters etc will allow the global community to more effectively represent the global community at events and talks or while giving presentations to medical clinics or potential funders for their work in their local areas.

• I flyer with the accurate timeline of events, correct history of e-NABLE and other important facts will ensure that the story is told properly everywhere it is presented. There have been numerous times over the past few years where presentations have been given or articles have been written that give inaccurate information about the origins of the e-NABLE Community and I think it would be valuable to the global community to have tangible printable pamphlets to share.

• This will give volunteers and chapters a set of printable tools to take with them when approaching possible funders or to attach to grant proposals etc.

Estimate of work involved:

200-300 hours

Deliverables:

Editable Tri Fold pamphlet with background history + information on how to get involved:
Editable Event posters - 5-10
Editable Updated Event banners - 3 different ones to choose from
Editable Business Cards 2-3 different designs (front and back or just front)
Editable Small postcard sized info sheets (printable at 4 per legal US sized sheet)
Editable “Get involved” flyers
Editable History of e-NABLE booklet with small images
Small social media sized e-NABLE Video
Image slides with history for presentations

Estimated timeline for completion:

6-8 weeks.

Names of individuals responsible for deliverables:

Jen Owen

Amount of Funding being requested:

$4000 from the $12,500 that has been set aside for my work and gifted to me already by the community. This funding request does not come out of the general funding amount, it comes out of the funds that the community has already set aside for my work.

*$20 per hour with an estimated 200 hours minimum to complete this project completely.

  • The average wage for professional graphic design work of this level in the Seattle area and level of experience = $29 an hour.

A brief overview of my background with e-NABLE:

I am the founder of enablingthefuture.org, a leader and co-founder of the e-NABLE Community and I have provided various graphic design work and materials for the e-NABLE Community for the past 4 years.

The first 3D printed e-NABLE Hand was created by my ex husband, Ivan Owen, in 2012 and I created a blog that helped to spread the word about e-NABLE and the first designs so that we could grow.

I have created the logo for the global community, the website (enablingthefuture.org) and numerous other designs for use by our volunteers, all of the badges being used by our volunteers, design challenges, event materials and many other useful tools for the global community and enjoy helping to make it possible for our chapters and volunteers to share their work and our community story with the world.

Proposed payout schedule:

4 Payments of $1000 dependent on deliverables. Each deliverable will take different amounts of time as some are more complex than others but on average, there should be at least 2 deliverables created in an equivalent of approximately 50 work hours.

Some deliverables will be faster to create than others and may result in 3-4 being produced in the 50 hours per payout period.

On average, payment will be requested after every 50 hours of work time and when another deliverable or group of deliverables are completed.

Payment should

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 100.0% 15 JS JS J TO AT RH RV WM QM JM QV K IL JOW BH
Abstain 0.0% 0  
Disagree 0.0% 0  
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 72 EL AB E DU JO W ME RB JL AC PB JS AD JP AT LB JS SM DD T

15 of 87 people have participated (17%)

JS

Jeremy Simon
Agree
Wed 28 Mar 2018 12:49AM

I love it! I think these materials would provide a lot of value to the whole community.

IL

Ian Lewis
Agree
Wed 28 Mar 2018 1:05PM

I would also like to see some metric sizes, for example A4 and not just US paper sizes

JS

Jon Schull
Agree
Wed 28 Mar 2018 3:19PM

This would be a great way to unify as well as celebrate the diversity of our interconnected community. It should also encourage new leaders to make new contributions (e.g., guidance documents for Chapter leaders using the same visuals)..

JOW

James O. Whitlock
Agree
Wed 28 Mar 2018 4:02PM

I would even be willing to make a modest contribution towards this work to encourage it. I need editable masters right now for an Enable-inspired event on April 25th. We'll want to include links for our own nascent WNYEnable in addition to others.

JS

Jon Schull Wed 28 Mar 2018 3:24PM

@jenowen What is the proposed payout schedule?

JO

Jen Owen Wed 28 Mar 2018 3:36PM

oh - I should go add that :) Thanks Jon!

SM

Skip Meetze Sat 31 Mar 2018 11:07AM

Wow! Jen, I think you have just invented a type of “open-source graphic design”! You have been involved as a volunteer in this wonderful community for the past 5 years where open-source mechanical design has been exploited by volunteers all around you. Now you are creating graphic designs and offering the open-source design files to the world as customizable graphics that will be very useful to our community. Thank you!

EL

Poll Created Fri 7 Jun 2019 5:42PM

**Update to the e-NABLE Project Proposals Process** Closed Fri 21 Jun 2019 8:01AM

The proposed update is:
* In order to propose a project the "PROJECT OWNER" need to be part of an e-NABLE Chapter and the chapter act as "PROJECT SPONSOR".
* If the PROJECT OWNER is not part of a chapter, the PROJECT OWNER need to connect to a chapter.
* The PROJCT OWNER will report the project status of the chapter and the chapter will report back to the community via weekly SPC meetings.
* The funds will be given to the Chapter and the chapter will be passing the funds to the PROJECT OWNER/TEAM based on project deliverables.
* The PROJECT OWNER will be accountable for the project deliverables and the Chapter will act as the PROJECT SPONSOR, auditing the project and validatig that what was proposed is what is being done.

This small change will ensure that the volunteers in charge of the proposed projects are really part of the community and that they are in touch, even if not face-to-face, with people that understand e-NABLE values and needs.

With this process change we will have the following improvements:

  1. The PROJECT OWNER reports the project status to the chapter and the chapter report back to the community via the Weekly SPC Meetings.

  2. e-NABLE will have a due registered entity (The chapter) being accountable for the project.

  3. The project proposals will in most cases be validated by the chapter before goeing to Loomio. This will add more reliability to the project proposed.

  4. The risk of someone that have never before interacted with e-NABLE request a project fund and never deliver after approval will be drastically reduced as the chapter will be part the project stakeholders and and also an auditing part.

Please share your thoughts and votes.
Lets make the community more organized and ensure that the funds are being well spent.

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
This should be treated as a "Best Practice" and be an "Optional Requirement" depending on the project variables (as project size, impact, budget, and risk) that should be defined later. 68.4% 13 EL E JS SM DD T KB RV EP WM QM NM JB
This should be treated as a "Best Practice" and not a requirement to request funding. 26.3% 5 JS JB M LG BR
This should be treated as a "Requirement" to request funding. 5.3% 1 J
This should not be applied in any way. 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 121 AB DU JO S W ME RB JL AC PB JS AD JP AT LB TO JS GD AJ JB

19 of 140 people have participated (13%)

EL

Everton Lins Fri 7 Jun 2019 5:45PM

This should be treated as a "Best Practice" and be an "Optional Requirement" depending on the project variables (as project size, impact, budget, and risk) that should be defined later.

We should have options and tools to work on all scenarios.

JS

Jon Schull Fri 7 Jun 2019 7:21PM

This should be treated as a "Best Practice" and not a requirement to request funding.

We can advertise it as a best practice and then for specific proposals that are NOT affiliated with a Chapter, voters can decide whether to pass it anyway, or state that they would only pass it if it WERE associated with a Chapter.

JS

Jeremy Simon Fri 7 Jun 2019 8:34PM

This should be treated as a "Best Practice" and be an "Optional Requirement" depending on the project variables (as project size, impact, budget, and risk) that should be defined later.

I like the idea of it being an "optional requirement" so we can require it for more significant proposals. We would need to determine who makes that call. Is it an SPC review kind of thing?

JB

Jacquin Buchanan Mon 10 Jun 2019 5:00PM

This should be treated as a "Best Practice" and not a requirement to request funding.

What are the requirements to be an e-nable Chapter? I don't think they are well defined. So you are adding paper work with out adding oversight. For this to work like you want, you need a Chapter approval process. Along with timely reporting from every chapter.
I instead, like the idea of reporting directly to the SPC board. There should be some sort of regular written and possible verbal (online or otherwise) report about the progress of a funded project.

T

Theo Mon 10 Jun 2019 6:23PM

This should be treated as a "Best Practice" and be an "Optional Requirement" depending on the project variables (as project size, impact, budget, and risk) that should be defined later.

This seems to me a legit move for a hierarchically structured organization, but we are not.
Its implementation will necessarily leave along the roadside all chapters too far, too small, too unwary ; the very chapters this fund should help.
We've already had a schism and the building of a pyramid among our flat organization, it failed.
This is a lot of work meant to prevent only point 4 in the improvements.
How many times are we aware of such attempts, and how many times did they succeed ?

J

Jen Mon 10 Jun 2019 8:19PM

This should be treated as a "Requirement" to request funding.

Can we provide resources for people not in a region with a chapter, or encourage the creation of a chapter specifically for oversight across larger regions?

LG

Leland Green Tue 11 Jun 2019 11:05AM

This should be treated as a "Best Practice" and not a requirement to request funding.

IF
* The local chapter has been inactive/unresponsive to someone. (I'm not saying that's happened, and I hope it doesn't -- just thinking out loud here.... :nerd: )
* It's inconvenient/impossible for some people to update in weekly SPC meetings. (For whatever reasons. E.g., "I don't have a webcam on my PC and no smart phone.")
* Local chapter is new and nobody knows about making prosthetics, you may as well ask people on the street to do your "pre-approval". :-)
Then: Should not be required.

JB

Jason Bender Thu 20 Jun 2019 12:32PM

This should be treated as a "Best Practice" and be an "Optional Requirement" depending on the project variables (as project size, impact, budget, and risk) that should be defined later.

I just don't see this solving the problem it is set out to solve. E.g I live in Myanmar, where there is (currently) no chapter. So I could start my own chapter, which in the end would have the essentially the same oversight as having no chapter. I think regular (quarterly?) updates submitted to the SPC or to a specific section of Wikifactory is a better option, but question remains who will be responsible for keeping track of active projects and holding recipients accountable?

EL

Everton Lins Fri 7 Jun 2019 8:50PM

@jeremysimon To let the process as fluid as possible, if this option passes, maybe it's easier to create some thresholds that if reached, the project goes through this evaluation process to validate if it's necessary to have this as a requirement or not. But it is something to talk about a little more. This is just an idea.

EL

Everton Lins Mon 10 Jun 2019 6:09PM

Hello @jacquinbuchanan how are you?
Your question is very pertinent and also one of my concerns.
The process on how to become is a 5 step process (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NyWABbbC60dbN3jtAPY92Sw5lOfdr-Py) and after that the chapter is self organized by the chapter internal team.

That's why on the phrasing we choose to put it as "Optional" and not a "mandatory" requirement, because the application of It will also depend on the level of self organization of the chapter that step up to work with this additional process.

As the projects approved are for the whole community to benefit from, the idea is to get the community on board to help in the process in an optional way.

As the chapter is the strongest link between the volunteers and SPC that's where this process better fit.

Hope I have helped in clarifying the proposal and thank you very much for your input!