2014-215 Focal Point Mandate

Every year, YOUNGO reviews and approves he Focal Point mandate vote. The Focal Point mandate was last reviewed in July 2013. I have copied this proposal from last year's, and copied the Draft Mandate from last year's, changing dates only.
Please note the deadlines for discussion and voting.
*This discussion describes a process to review, potentially amend, and decide on the mandate and voting rules for the 2014-2015 YOUNGO Focal Points.
YOUNGO needs to decide on the Focal Point election process before YOUNGO gets to Lima. Please read the entire email if you intend to participate in the review and decision making.*
Title of Proposed Decision: Focal Point Mandate and Election Process 2014-2015
Context of the Proposed Decision: The current, 2013-2014 Focal Point mandate and election process was only approved for one year and governs the current focal points and the election process that was conducted in Warsaw. A new election process and mandate must be approved in advance of the Focal Point election for 2014-2015, tentatively to be held in December 2014 in Lima, Peru. Maintenance of a liaison to the UNFCCC Secretariat is required for YOUNGO's continued existence as a constituency within the UNFCCC. This voting procedure closely follows previous Focal Point voting procedures.
Contact Information for the Facilitators of the Proposed Decision: Bottomlining Team - bottomliners@googlegroups.com
Timeline of the Review and Vote on the Proposed Decision:
The review and vote of the proposed decision will follow the standard Decision Making Procedures already adopted by YOUNGO, with abbreviated time limits due to the need to make a decision before Lima.
Deadline for edits to the proposal: 21 November 2014
Deadline for decision-making: 28 November 2014
Note: Individuals interested in being a Focal Point for 2013-2014 are requested to refrain from active participation in the decision about the voting process
for Focal Point elections. Those who participate actively in this decision are asked to refrain from putting themselves forward as Focal Point candidates for 2013-2014.
How to Comment on the Proposal:
If you support the proposal as written, you do not have to comment now, but please vote accordingly in the voting week.
If you oppose any part of the proposal, you may raise a "red flag" (objection)
* An objection must state which specific part of the proposal you object to and state the rationale for your objection
* The proposal authors will work with the person raising the objection to try to modify the proposal to incorporate the suggestions proposed by the objector
* Objections raised during the decision-making period must relate to objections already raised during the edit period that were not fully addressed, and must be raised by at least two independent people
* If an objection is maintained after discussions, the proposal is blocked until it can be resolved through a resolution committee or mediation between the proposal author(s) and objector(s).
The current Focal Point mandate is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iANA6jdJ3bW38wfoOAGvVFHesEoraw6HbX5HvYhyYRk/edit?usp=sharing
The proposed updated Focal Point mandate is here: https://docs.google.com/a/davidtong.co.nz/document/d/1W0D4DuGGh-BFXttTejaeNy6WqiSgKt20438QAhNQUg8/edit?usp=sharing

David Tong Sat 15 Nov 2014 6:32PM
Please do ahead and make your changes directly into the document!
I wonder if it would also be good to clarify that Focal Points should report to each Bottomlining Team meeting?

Federico Brocchieri Sat 15 Nov 2014 10:36PM
I have just added my proposal as "suggestion", so you can now find it in green between the second and the third bullet points in the "Focal points shall not" section. Let me know how you feel about it!
Luke Kemp Mon 17 Nov 2014 3:28AM
I've made a few changes to grammar (including for Fed's text), some quick comments (nothing extremely important) and three suggestions. The first, based on David's suggestion, is that we mandate the focal points to attend Bottomlining team meetings and provide a report of their activities. Another is a quick addition to the preferred profile, specifying that they experience in administration, since that is the main role of the focal point. I also added in a bit about the bottom-lining group being able to put forward an expression of no-confidence in the focal points if they think they are violating their mandate (below the list of activities of what the focal point shall not do). This is nothing binding, but hopefully it would provide some social deterrence. It would be strange for us to note historical problems with focal points overstepping their mandate and then not add any compliance mechanism whatsoever. But, if this is too much for some, then it can be removed. Otherwise I'm happy with the document.

Cat Hudson Mon 17 Nov 2014 3:11PM
Just to clarify - are we voting on the edited proposal or the original proposal?
Thanks,
Cat

David Tong Mon 17 Nov 2014 7:27PM
I probably jumped the gun making the vote! Sorry - when the voting period starts (22-28 November), I suggest we vote on the proposal as edited.
Thanks!

David Tong Tue 18 Nov 2014 4:45AM
If it's useful - here's the original 2009 mandate and selection procedure: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnx1bmZjY2N5b3VuZ298Z3g6NGJjMjhlNjU1NjI2OTMyYw

Federico Brocchieri Thu 27 Nov 2014 8:50PM
Agree on the updated version!
Federico Brocchieri · Sat 15 Nov 2014 5:34PM
Sure, I still did not add any comment. Will do so shortly!