Software Paper Discussion
A thread for public discussion regarding how EarthArXiv should handle software papers
Victor Venema Sun 17 Mar 2019 2:03PM
I agree. To repeat my previous comment:
"Also in general I would advocate being more open rather than more closed with respect to types of scientific contributions than traditional journals. That is one of the strengths of repositories and one of its gifts to open science."
Evan Goldstein Tue 26 Mar 2019 3:09PM
Would be neat to also explicitly solicit papers focused on replications of software, like ReScience
Tom Narock Wed 17 Apr 2019 12:59PM
I created a shared Google Doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zOTQAvF7jj7wz1lIUyKZK4TtTNuSiFclyFM0lYHcl_M/edit?usp=sharing Please take a look when you have time and let's collaboratively revise the EarthArXiv software paper submission guidelines.
Christopher Jackson Thu 18 Apr 2019 3:45PM
Thanks @tomnarock1. I added some comments, although software isn't my area of expertise. @danielnust may have some thoughts.
Tom Narock Thu 18 Apr 2019 5:25PM
Thanks Chris. I reached out to Gavin (who commented on our policy in his blog post) and he is interested in contributing as well. I believe @leonardouieda is also interested.
brandon Fri 17 May 2019 8:55AM
Perhaps peripheral, but may be of interest here: https://github.com/duecredit/duecredit
Tom Narock Thu 30 May 2019 4:10PM
Sorry for dropping the ball on this. I got this started and then it got away from me. I'd like to propose a deadline for any additional comments revising our software paper policy - say mid-June? Then we can turn it over to the Advisory Council for vote and hopefully put it into place later this summer.
To review where we are see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zOTQAvF7jj7wz1lIUyKZK4TtTNuSiFclyFM0lYHcl_M/edit?usp=sharing
The general idea is to modify the software paper portion of the moderation policy to begin accepting software papers akin to other Earth science publication venues
Tom Narock Mon 1 Jul 2019 5:43PM
I've updated our Moderation Policy based on the positive responses in the poll. I added text to indicate we welcome software papers - https://eartharxiv.github.io/moderation.html
Daniel Ibarra Tue 2 Jul 2019 4:00AM
Great! Let's see if that encourages some software papers.
Bruce Caron · Sat 16 Mar 2019 2:41PM
One of the promises of preprints is to expand the types of science objects that are publicly available, including, potentially, null results, confirmations of the validity of other research, and software papers. All of these need to pass muster as "real science". But none of them need to be sexy or fit into a narrow topic for "this issue of X". Perhaps now is a good time for the users of EarthArXiv to begin the conversation on how to expand this platform to meet its promise. IMHO.