Loomio
Wed 29 Nov 2017 12:20AM

3.0 Soft freeze exemptions

ND Nyall Dawson Public Seen by 24

Polls regarding whether the following PRs should be granted exemption from the soft freeze and merged prior to 3.0:

  • https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5600: "Add order by expression processing algorithm". Very low risk - it's a self contained algorithm on which nothing else depends. Processing in 3.0 is awesome, and has made great strides to becoming a competitive ETL tool. This algorithm would very nicely complement the work already done in 3.0 to make models more powerful and flexible.

  • https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5430: "More output format choices in raster save as dialog": Low risk. Changes only affect the dialog, and an extra convenience member in
    QgsRasterFileWriter (which is accompanied by unit tests)

  • https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5729: "[processing] Expose dynamic ("data defined") numeric parameters to gui". Low-medium risk. Most of the changes here are gui related, just exposing functionality which already exists in the new processing backend (and which is covered by stacks of unit tests). I'd love to see this included in 3.0 as it changes some of the processing API, and I would like wider testing and porting of algorithms to utilise this BEFORE the API is locked in place and we're stuck with it. I'd rather identify any issues in the related API here for 3.0. Additionally, the changes to the "set z value" algorithm which allows the z value to be pulled from a field or expression is extremely useful in preparing datasets for use in the new 3d views. Plus, it's an absolute KILLER feature to have.

  • https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5663: "Add a name for transactions created from executeSql". It's marked as a feature and tagged as 3.2, but looking over it it seems to be almost entirely api tweaks and a unit test. I'd say this is low risk, especially given Paul's history of stable commits and how well unit tested this are of code is already.

  • https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5922 (duplicate feature redigitized)

  • https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5925 (duplicate child feature in relationwidget of attributeform)

  • https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5961 (Contextmenu with individual actions (in form view side column))

ND

Poll Created Wed 29 Nov 2017 12:21AM

#5600 Add order by expression processing algorithm Closed Sat 2 Dec 2017 12:09AM

Should we merge #5600 for 3.0?

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Yes 78.6% 11 TS JF MD DR AB NW ND LS SL DU MP
Abstain 21.4% 3 S PB HM
No 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 13 PC GS MK WM AN TK M PK SB AP RB SM V

14 of 27 people have participated (51%)

ND

Poll Created Wed 29 Nov 2017 12:22AM

Merge #5430: More output format choices in raster save as dialog Closed Sat 2 Dec 2017 12:09AM

Should we merge #5430 prior to 3.0 release?

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Yes 68.8% 11 TS PC MK JF MD DR AB ND LS SL MP
Abstain 31.3% 5 AN S DU PB HM
No 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 11 GS WM NW TK M PK SB AP RB SM V

16 of 27 people have participated (59%)

ND

Poll Created Wed 29 Nov 2017 12:23AM

#5729 [processing] Expose dynamic ("data defined") numeric parameters to gui Closed Sat 2 Dec 2017 12:09AM

Should we merge #5729 prior to 3.0 release?

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Yes 82.4% 14 TS PC MK JF MD DR AB NW ND LS AN SL DU MP
Abstain 17.6% 3 S PB HM
No 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 10 GS WM TK M PK SB AP RB SM V

17 of 27 people have participated (62%)

MK

Matthias Kuhn Fri 1 Dec 2017 10:59AM

Yes

Having this available in the GUI will give us much more testing. And it's opt-in. +1d

ND

Poll Created Wed 29 Nov 2017 12:23AM

#5663: Add a name for transactions created from executeSql Closed Sat 2 Dec 2017 12:09AM

Should we merge #5663 prior to 3.0 release?

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Yes 64.7% 11 PC MK JF MD DR AB NW ND LS AN S
Abstain 23.5% 4 TS SL DU MP
No 11.8% 2 PB HM
Undecided 0% 10 GS WM TK M PK SB AP RB SM V

17 of 27 people have participated (62%)

TS

Poll Created Thu 4 Jan 2018 7:47AM

Duplicate feature redigitized Closed Sun 7 Jan 2018 7:48AM

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5922

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 66.7% 6 TS DR WM LS SL DU
Abstain 33.3% 3 PC AB ND
Disagree 0.0% 0  
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 18 GS MK JF MD NW AN S TK MP M PB HM PK SB AP RB SM V

9 of 27 people have participated (33%)

TS

Poll Created Thu 4 Jan 2018 7:48AM

Duplicate child feature in relationwidget of attributeform Closed Sun 7 Jan 2018 7:48AM

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5925

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 88.9% 8 TS DR WM AB ND LS SL DU
Abstain 11.1% 1 PC
Disagree 0.0% 0  
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 18 GS MK JF MD NW AN S TK MP M PB HM PK SB AP RB SM V

9 of 27 people have participated (33%)

ND

Nyall Dawson
Agree
Thu 4 Jan 2018 8:11PM

Looks low risk to me

TS

Poll Created Thu 4 Jan 2018 7:49AM

Contextmenu with individual actions (in form view side column) Closed Sun 7 Jan 2018 7:48AM

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5961

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 62.5% 5 DR WM LS SL DU
Abstain 37.5% 3 PC AB ND
Disagree 0.0% 0  
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 19 TS GS MK JF MD NW AN S TK MP M PB HM PK SB AP RB SM V

8 of 27 people have participated (29%)